Late Breaking News
Follow Us
2012 Compendium
Is the VA Mental Health Scheduling System Gamed? Senators Seek Audit
- Categorized in: Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Depression, January 2012, News, PTSD, Rehabilitation, TBI
WASHINGTON — Frustrated by the numerous reports of veterans unable to receive timely mental healthcare at VA facilities, legislators have called for the VA Office of the Inspector General to conduct a formal audit of wait times.
![]() Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) |
In a letter to the VA IG, Sen. Patty Murray, (D-WA) chairwoman of the Senate VA Committee and Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), the committee’s ranking Republican, raised issues that have emerged in recent hearings.
Most notably, they are concerned about the contradiction between what VA staffers in the field are saying about their difficulties in getting expeditious care to veterans compared with the more optimistic tone VA officials have taken with Congress.
The senators specifically asked for an investigation of how accurately VA was tracking wait times.
“[Does] wait-time data VA collects represent an accurate depiction of veterans’ ability to access those services?” Murray and Burr wrote in their letter. “In addition, we ask that your office evaluate whether VA is accurately and completely reporting the data they collect.”
They have asked VA officials to fully cooperate with any forthcoming audit, and VA has agreed to do so.
*****************
Opinion poll:
Is VA doing enough to reduce wait times for veterans who need mental healthcare?
Please click here to participate in this month’s U.S. Medicine readership poll.
*****************
Long Wait Times, Short Staffing
The call for an investigation into VA wait times came after the latest Senate hearing on VA mental healthcare, in which VA provider testimony was in sharp contrast to that of VA leadership. The suggestion was that some VA schedulers were “gaming” the system to meet first-appointment requirements at the expense of quality of care for new and existing patients.
“Due to chronic short staffing at my facility and the inability to manage my patients’ appointments based on their individuals needs, I am frequently frustrated by my inability to provide care,” said Michelle Washington, PhD, coordinator of PTSD services and evidence-based psychotherapy at the Wilmington, DE, VA, who testified on behalf of the American Federation of Government Employees.
Several types of PTSD treatment are dependent not only on getting the patient into therapy as quickly as possible. but also making sure that the servicemember receives regular, usually weekly, treatment.
“But, too often I am told the patient will need to wait up to six weeks for an initial appointment,” Washington said. “Frequently the patient loses interest, or their PTSD worsens.”
Schedulers at the Wilmington VAMC are under huge pressure to make first appointments within the 14-day window set as a systemwide goal by VA headquarters. As a result, the treatment of current patients is sometimes sacrificed to meet that goal.
“They may take one of my regular PTSD patients’ appointments to fill this new patient’s appointment,” Washington said. “This hurts the effectiveness of my patient’s treatment.”
In addition, patients who have finished their courses of treatment sometimes stay on her roster for much longer than needed, due to the difficulty in making timely referrals to other VA physicians, Washington said. These patients take up slots that are desperately needed for new patients coming into the system.
One part of this problem, according to Washington, is the very low staffing of primary-care physicians assigned specifically to new veterans. Another is the lack of freedom that clinicians have in directing the course of care for each patient, either due to VA policy or to lack of resources, she said.
“As long as providers have little say in where and when to help patients, this will keep happening,” Washington told the committee.
That these staffing and scheduling issues could directly affect the efficacy of PTSD treatment was reinforced by Col. Charles Hoge (ret.), who directed the military’s research into PTSD from 2002 through 2009.
“Treatment is 70% to 80% effective for combat-related PTSD, if the veteran comes in for care and receives a sufficient number of sessions for treatment,” Hoge said. “And having coordination with primary care — having access to mental health as part of primary care — is really critical in the treatment of veterans.”
Related Psychiatry Articles
- TBI, PTSD Research Will Go On Despite DoD Budget Crunch
- Who Are Most Likely Military Suicide Victims? Guard Study Offers Some Valuable Clues
- Army Seeks to Improve Troop Resilience as Suicides Increase
- Alpha Blockers Tested as Potential Treatment for PTSD Symptoms
- Free Mobile App Offers Tools to Enhance PTSD Treatment
- Enlistment Waivers for Mental Health Tougher to Get with Reduction in Forces
- Medications for Depression, Psychosis Overused in VA Long-Term Care Facilities
- PTSD May Be Influenced More by Childhood Trauma than Experiences During Wartime
- Front-Line Clinicians Get Practical Advice To Help Combat Military Suicides
- Potential Overuse of Antipsychotic Drugs for PTSD Patients is Under Review




I had typed a response but being a coward at heart and fearful of being removed from employment I erased it all.
"The emperor has no clothes on" H. C. Anderson
I think we do pretty good job here at the Bay Pines VA in Florida with regards to seeing new patient's quickly, although follow-up can occasionally be a problem. We have also completely eliminated our backlog of C&P exams, and truly emergent patients are seen in an appropriate, timely, manner.
I hate to talk about the 800-pound Gorilla in the middle of the room, but I wish we could separate the issue of compensation and treatment. I've probably seen a few thousand veterans over the past 12 years, and to my recollection, as well as peers I've spoken to, no Vet has ever asked to have the PTSD diagnosis removed from their problem list or declared themselves improved and have given up their service connection disability payments.
If you 'own' your recovery, consistent with the Recovery Model, wouldn't this seem to be a contradiction?
Please don't waist time and money on another study that will make some congress person feel better. Get the VA additional people to process the claims and give the veterans the help and money they need to survive. Another study or audit is only going to slow the process down even more. There is a problem. Just fix it. You can't audit it and study it to make it better. It is not that difficult to see where the problems are and institute a solution.
This isn't a new problem. I've been a service connected disabled Vietnam veteran since 1978. The over booking, failure of staff to advise the veteran their doctor isn't in for their appointment, under staffed and long waits are the norm not the exception. At some point congress has to catch on to the sham the VA has been forstering.
If you think for one minute that the VA IG is going to give you a factual report I've I got bridge in Brooklyn for sale. Look deep into the problem by going to a clinic at the VAMC, DC. Sit around in one the clinic waiting rooms for an hour, you'll see what is really going on inside VHA. Check the radiology section to find out how hard it is to get an appointment. Call for an appointment only to be told the next available appointment is a 30-40 day wait. Take a trip to the OBG/YN section. If is isn't in the middle of a nearly all male waiting room (VAMC, Manhattan, NY) it will not a the needed staff, equipment, and lavatory facilities for female veterans.
I spent 2 1/2 years in the Appeals Management Center, I St, Washington, DC. Dr. Riveria and I discussed many of these issues during Veteran Service Officer monthly meetings. Would you like to get an ultra sound performed on a table without any foot support? Does a resident/intern make you feel confortable when needing help with you PTSD?
Please don't take my word for any of this information. Have someone on your staff go to a VHA with a veteran to see what kind of treatment they receive.
Generally speaking, it has been my experience, regardless of Department, that there is a difference between what is heard in Washington DC and out in the field. Certainly saw it in FDA.