Advertisement
Departments | Specialty Focus | Non-Clinical Topics | News | Special Issues | e-Newsletter | Education | Archive | Site Search

Designing a Better EMR to Combat Providers' Medication Alert Fatigue Cont

Designing A Better System

The researchers include a list of recommended actions, such as:

  • giving prescribers options for what point in the process they receive the alert;
  • indicating how well each alert is supported by the literature;
  • developing a standardized rating for risk;
  • displaying essential EMR data in the alert; and
  • eliminating the use of technical, programmer-specific and pharmacist-specific language.

The last recommendation stems from the fact that the medication alert system evolved out of a pharmacist-specific scenario and was never adapted for the nurse practitioners and physicians who commonly use EMRs.

“The general progression, not specific to VA, seems to be that alert systems were developed for pharmacists and used in pharmacies as medications were dispensed for patients,” explained Alissa Russ, PhD, lead researcher on the study. “These alert systems were created using medication databases and terminology geared toward pharmacists. As computerized provider order entry systems were developed, the data systems used in pharmacies were transferred over to EMRs. As a result, the EMR alert systems do not necessarily account for the varying training and expertise of physicians and nurse practitioners. A good system would have alerts that support this range of expertise.”

Such a system also would have fewer, more easily understandable alerts, although how that could be implemented is uncertain.

“The ideal strategy to reduce the number of alerts is still unknown,” Russ said. “Participants in the study offered some ideas, including a smarter alert system that can remember the patient and previous alerts, coordinating with pharmacists to turn off individual alerts that are appropriately overridden and suppressing alerts under specific circumstances. But these ideas have not been tested.” 

While this study provided valuable insights into the interaction between alerts and providers, what is needed now are evidence-based design recommendations for how to make the system better. Russ and her team are wrapping up a simulation study in which they have tested experimental designs for medication alerts based on their previous findings, as well as input from an expert VA advisory panel.

“Twenty prescribers were recruited for this simulation study, and redesigned alerts were compared against the VA alert system in the VA Health Services Research and Development Human-Computer Interaction Laboratory,” Russ said. “The simulation study has focused on the display format of alerts, how to increase the salience or noticeability of alerts and how to better integrate alerts into clinical workflow.”

Results from the simulation will be shared with the advisory panel, as well as other VA leaders, Russ said.

  1. Russ AL, Zillich AJ, McManus MS, Doebbeling BN, Saleem JJ. Prescribers' interactions with medication alerts at the point of prescribing: A multi-method, in situ investigation of the human-computer interaction. Int J Med Inform. 2012Apr;81(4):232-43. Epub 2012 Jan 31. PubMed PMID: 22296761.

Back to May Articles


Comments (4)

Dennis
Said this on 5-23-2012 At 07:27 pm
I try to review and adjust to all alerts. I believe alarm fatigue is a real concern, and an ill understood menace to the patient safety. The overabundance of alerts crosses many facets of the EMR. Alerts are rarely weighted, so the value (risk) cannot be appreciated under most circumstances. When attention, a finite, mortal commodity, is being continually challenged by alerts in cosmic proportion, the potential for error is real and sadly predictable. I am glad to know that a medication that am starting today has a potential interaction with an antibiotic a prior provider gave my patient 2 years ago, or that some nebulous administrative issue regarding a remote OTC still remains unfinished and deserving of attention as well, but the continuing glare of these useless alerts is blinding me to the oncoming traffic, and that is a safety issue. I am in the driver seat with my patient as passenger and I can't see clearly. I surmise, as a result of the barrage of alarms and alerts, that by 10 am my (Neuron / Moron) cellular ratio has changed to favor the denominator.:(((
I have been saved more times than I care to admit by alerts, and don't want throw out the baby with the bath water , but we have to clean the water. It is not safe for the baby either way. We need alert filters on all levels. :)))
Daniel Stephenson
Said this on 5-23-2012 At 10:43 am
There are so many alerts, notifications and comments that it is nearly impossible to satisfy any medication order. All medications have danger. Several vets have severe reactions to a medication and it becomes a nationwide critical alert with what appears to be a knee-jerk reaction. Then complex notifications for each drug come up, and the notifications are duplicated by the search engine so you are alerted for the same interaction twice.

The deeper problem is the EMR is designed by people that have been playing video games since they were old enough to climb onto the chair in front of the computer, and their minds work the computer interface intuitively. Then these geeks design systems for real people to do real work, but they sit in a cubical doing software and have never had an overbook, never had to transfer a patient and have never had their finger in someone's orifices. They then design complex interactive multilayered systems that require mining data. entering data that is irrelevant and generally eating up virtual memory in some data back six story tower and severs little patient safety result.

We are saturate with this stuff!
elsheikh kineish
Said this on 5-23-2012 At 08:58 am
i always respond to pharmacy view alerts
Christine Baker
Said this on 5-23-2012 At 08:09 am
At least 50% of the alerts I receive when entering prescriptions are for duplications of class, or interactions with, medications which have been discontinued. Thus every time I change a patient's therapy for the same condition I get the same quality of alert that I would receive for a potentially dangerous interaction with an actively used medication. This seems to continue for quite some time after the medication is discontinued. Fixing this one issues would make me more likely to pay closer attention to alerts. When half of them are irrelevant and a waste of time it is tempting to ignore them all.
Post a Comment (showhide)
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Approval Notification:
Website:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement